Popular Posts

Search This Blog

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Singapore Open 18-23 June 2013

The journey to the Singapore Indoor Stadium was greeted with the choking Haze from Indonesia which can ranged from a mild 100 PSI (Pollutant Standards Index) to 400 PSI. Haze was at its choking worst around 1pm.

The journey to the indoor stadium was greeted with a cool and safe refuge from the merciless haze.


There are some games for enthusiasts to play.

Some notable incident happen during the games.

During the quaterfinals match on Friday night, saw a tired Marc Zwiebler v.s. Nguyen Tien Minh.
Prior to this match, Marc Zwiebler fought and won a marathon match against Du Pengyu of China.
Such was the effect of the match, that Marc Zwiebler of Germany conceded his game halfway giving the victory to Nguyen Tien Minh of Vietnam.

The other was on Thursday 20th of June, which saw Boonsak Ponsana of Thailand v.s. Wong Wing Ki of Hong Kong.
The handle of Wong Wing Ki's Adidas racquet broke in the middle of a vigorous backhand stroke.
The snap of the Adidas racquet drew gasps from the crowds.
The racquet used by Wong Wing Ki is the Adidas Precision Pro.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Sudirman Cup 2013 @ Stadium Putra, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, 19th to 26th May

My second trip to Bukit Jalil Kuala Lumpur.
The view of the soccer stadium at night from the Sri Petaling Rail Transit line.

The official poster of the Li-Ning Sudirman Cup 2013. It's the first time Li-Ning is supporting the Sudirman cup.
The venue, Stadium Putra (indoor stadium)

Linesman walking up to court in a mostly empty stadium.
An autograph signing session from a Chinese National player, Xu Chen (徐晨).

Impression of the 1st Sudirman cup I attended;

Very quiet on the 24th, 25th and 26th. The local team, Malaysia was eliminated early. So was Indonesia, a provider of massive fan support.

The stadium was quite empty, barely 1/10 capacity.

On the 24th, morning session, even on a Wesak public holiday, the stadium was practically empty.
The Wesak day (24th)  matches were a meaningless games where the eliminated teams from Europe, North America, Ocenia and Asia were playing. Perhaps it's for future ranking points...

The merchandise sold by Li-Ning was pretty expensive, with no discounts enjoyed by spectators paying for watching the matches.

Fans who watch are mostly nationalistic supporters and not genuine badminton fans. Fans cheer the country just like World Cup soccer.

The stadium was dimly lit like the All-England super series.

Despite some problems, the trip was overall quite enjoyable seeing a special team event like the Sudirman cup up close and personal.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Deceptive backhand drop

Here Lee Chong Wei executes a reverse backhand drop.

Shuttle is sliced horrizontally, but racquet head is moving to the right, creating an illusion of a crosscourt drop.

GIFSoup


Sunday, April 28, 2013

India Open 2013

Conclusion of India Open 2013.

The finals features 3 upsets.

Miyuki Maeda/Satoko Suetsuna def. Christina Pedersen/Kamilla Rytter Juhl in a thrilling rubber game;
12-21, 23-21, 21-18.

Miyuki Maeda directly gives her Voltric 70 racquet to fans.

For a moment I thought the crowd will grab her instead of the racquet. It's best to throw the racquet into the crowd rather than giving it directly to the kid or person.

GIFSoup

The other upsets are rising Chinese MD Liu Xiaolong/Qiu Zihan upsetting Lee Yong Dae/Ko Sung Hyun
 in straight sets 22-20, 21-18.

The other is WS, where 3rd seat Thai Ratchanok Intanon def. 2nd seat German Juliane Schenk 22-20, 21-14.

The other games are status quo;

MS: Lee C.W. (Mas) def. Tago K. (JPN)
XD: Ahmad T./Natsir L. (INA) def. Ko S.H./Kim H.N. (KOR)

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Brief ArcsaberFB demo review


Yonex Arcsaber FB
Review Date : 13 April 2013
Racquet Type : Yonex Arcsaber FB SP version
Specs : F(73g) G5
Flex: Stiff
Balance: 280 mm +(Headlight Balance)
Strings: Yonex BG66
Tension: 25lbs, pre-stretched using Yonex ES5PROTECH
Grip: Karakal super PU grip
Technology : (New) Nanometric and CS Nanotube
Shuttles used: Apacs Aeroflight 700

First Impression:

I won't described the colors or the looks of the racquet as the manufacturer's website and badmintoncentral.com has plenty of those.
A new twist to the arcsaber line, with ultra light weight. Swingspeed is increased and whipping power is enhanced using nanometric material on the shaft.
Similar in shape and flex to Arcsaber 11 but having different materials at the frame and the T-joint.

Final review

I played mostly doubles (and half court singles)
TOC (time on court) when making review:
total of 4 hours of game play.

Warm Ups:

Warming involves baseline to baseline forehand clears.
Clears are long and far owing to the aerodynamics, lightness and the flex of the racquet.
If one word is to describe this racquet is 'quick'.
Drives are pretty fast owing to the weight of the racquet. 
The racquet shaft is similar to Arcsaber 11 and felt that the stiffness is the same but the kickpoint is very different.
A very fast swing is generated when whipped for overhead shots.
The major difference I felt is that Arcsaber 11 have a more solid feel and more repulsive string bed.


Game Time:

I won't go into detail each and every shots tried.
Generally since I am playing doubles, receiving of serve and serve are great as expected for a fast and stable racquet.
The ease of use of this racquet is apparent, as one can comfortably whip the racquet to hit shuttle gently or violently. 
Initially a lot of mishits using this racquet as the racquet is 'too fast'.

Front court: Aerodynamics of the racquet and the lightness of the racquet allows quick and fast reaction to perform netshots, netkills and crosscourt net shots.

Midcourt: This racquet shines best in the mid court range area as it is both good in attack and defence. As for drive shots, this racquet can rival the Nanorays in fast reactions, with comfortable control support cap helps in using finger power (Thumb and grip tightening) for sharp compact backswing in backhand drives.

Back court:
The control and power suffers a tiny bit as it it not heavy nor stiff enough like Voltric Z-force for power smash and power clears to the back court.
Nevertheless, the sweet spot is rather large and felt very easy to whip this racquet as the kickpoint is leaning towards the frame.The fast swing and kickpoint makes up for the lack of momentum of a heavier racquet.
Control is good, slicing (normal and reverse) and checked drops are precise, fast and accurate.

Conclusion:
This racquet's playability is great as it is very comfortable to wield this racquet both forehands and backhands. A dedicated doubles racquet where speed is the name of the game.

Feel: 7/10

Control: 9/10

Power: 8.5/10

Defence: 10/10

Maneuverability: 10/10

Pros: Fast and easy to use racquet. 

Cons: Perhaps durability and lack of 'heavy' solid feel 

Suitability: intermediate/advanced doubles racquet

Player type: Doubles fast counterattacking

Footnote: this review was done as a hobby and as an interest to inform fellow badminton enthusiast. This is my personal opinion and in no form to promote this racquet.

Conflict of interest: None

Reference: Yonex website (accessed @ 29/3/13)

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Arcsabers Kaizen

The arcsabers are revamped this year like Arc11 and Arc FB. Last year, there's arc i-slash.

Previously there's new technology to augment Arcsabers (even balance racquets) like the Z-slash, 8-DX and now the FB. Surprisingly, there's constant improvement or in Japanese, kaizen (改善).

I reckon, even balanced racquet need the extra (even infinitesimal) boost to the playability. Even balanced racquets are harder to use compared to head heavy racquets (or forehand biased) or headlight racquets (backhand biased racquets).

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Yonex Arcsaber 11 Review



Yonex Arcsaber 11
Review Date : 3 March 2013
Racquet Type : Yonex Arcsaber 11 SP version
Specs : 3UG5
Flex: Stiff
Balance: 285 mm (Even Balance)
Strings: Yonex BG80 Power
Tension: 27lbs, pre-stretched using Yonex ES5PROTECH
Grip: Yonex cushion wrap+ original grip + Toalson overgrip
Technology : (New) Sonic Metal, T-Anchor and CS Nanotube Neo
Shuttles used: Apacs Aeroflight 700


First Impression: 
I won't described the colors or the looks of the racquet as the manufacturer's website and badmintoncentral.com has plenty of those.
A successor to the flashy but difficult to use Arcsaber 10.
Similar in shape and flex to Arcsaber 10 but having different materials at the frame and the T-joint.
This racquet occupies the same niche and has the same specs as the Arcsaber 10 i.e. stiff flex and even balance.
To put things into perspective, I am benchmarking this racquet against Arcsaber 10 which is somewhat difficult racquets to use for the majority of non-competitive players.

Final comprehensive review

I played mostly doubles (and half court singles)

TOC (time on court) when making review:

total of 20 hours of game play.


Warm Ups:
Warming involves baseline to baseline forehand clears.
Clears are long and far owing to the aerodynamics, repulsion and the flex of the racquet.
If one word is to describe this racquet is 'comfortable'.
Drives are pretty fast owing to the 'repulsive' (Sonic metal) frame. The handle of the racquet is the same length as the Nanospeed and Nanoray range, hence very good for holding the racquet higher up the handle for faster reaction.
The racquet shaft is similar to Arcsaber 10 and felt that the stiffness and kickpoint is the same.

The major difference I felt is that Arcsaber 11 have a more solid feel and more repulsive string bed.
Perhaps it's the effort of the designers to improve the somewhat lame duck feel of the frame of Arcsaber 11.
Cup stacked nano tube was originally design like (a spring) to provide a trampoline effect whilst (improving control?).
Quote,'Increased durability and improved flexibility allow the frame to return back to its original shape faster. Positioned at the sides of the racquet, CS Carbon Nanotubes improve the frame’s elasticity, holding the shuttle on the string bed for enhanced control at the point of impact.' -Yonex.com.


Game Time:
I won't go into detail each and every shots tried.
Generally since I am playing doubles, receiving of serve and serve are great as expected for a fast and stable racquet.
The ease of use of this racquet is apparent, as one can comfortably whip the racquet to hit shuttle gently or violently.

Front court: Aerodynamics of the racquet and the long handle of the racquet allows quick and fast reaction to perform netshots, netkills and crosscourt net shots.

Midcourt: This racquet shines best in the mid court range area as it is both good in attack and defence. As for drive shots, this racquet can rival the Nanorays in fast reactions, heck (it shares the same material as the king of drive aka Nanoray 800) Long handle and comfortable control support cap helps in using finger power (Thumb and grip tightening) for sharp compact backswing in backhand drives.

Back court:
The control and power suffers a tiny bit as it it not heavy nor stiff enough like Voltric Z-force for power smash and power clears to the back court.
Nevertheless, the sweet spot is rather large and felt very easy to whip this racquet as the kickpoint is leaning towards the handle.
Control is excellent, slicing (normal and reverse) and checked drops are precise, fast and accurate.

Conclusion: 
This racquet's playability is great as it is very comfortable to wield this racquet both forehands and backhands. An improvement to Arcsaber 10 with better repulsion and ease of use.

Feel: 9/10

Control: 9.5/10


Power: 8.5/10


Defence: 9/1
0

Maneuverability: 9/10

Pros: Ease of use and generally an all rounder racquet.

Cons: Almost none.

Suitability: intermediate/advanced players 3U and 2U

Player type: All rounder.

Footnote: this review was done as a hobby and as an interest to inform fellow badminton enthusiast. This is my personal opinion and in no form to promote this racquet.

Conflict of interest: None

Reference: Yonex website (accessed @ 24/2/13)